<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clear Insights &#187; software development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clearskies.net/blog/tag/software-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clearskies.net/blog</link>
	<description>Security News You Can Use</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:06:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sears.com Vulnerability Reinforces Need for Manual Testing</title>
		<link>http://clearskies.net/blog/2009/09/02/sears-com-vuln-reinforces-need-for-manual-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://clearskies.net/blog/2009/09/02/sears-com-vuln-reinforces-need-for-manual-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 01:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick B.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Application Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pen testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearskies.net/blog/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New vulnvulnerability in Sears.com website reinforces the need for manual pen testing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearskies.net/blog/2009/09/02/sears-com-vuln-reinforces-need-for-manual-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you use &#8220;traditional&#8221; penetration testing?</title>
		<link>http://clearskies.net/blog/2009/01/16/do-you-use-traditional-penetration-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://clearskies.net/blog/2009/01/16/do-you-use-traditional-penetration-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pen testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clearsecurity.org/blog/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent article goes deep into explaining penetration testing and how it should be adapted to focus on software development issues.  Hopefully the penetration testing services you are getting are ahead of the curve and are already tailored to provide you this value.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://clearskies.net/blog/2009/01/16/do-you-use-traditional-penetration-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

